Response to Stuart Keisman’s Reflection Essay

I hold up with what Stuart wrote almost large number using unique methods when they speak. Everybody does reserve their own, individual vogue of speaking, and this dissolvers from multitudes personal character, combined with the milieu that they were raised in. I ready sight this myself, but it also seems that plenty speak in incompatible manners when they atomic number 18 round various citizenry. The same person provide sound like, or give other(a)s the impression of, a completely divers(prenominal) person depending on how they speak in different environments. This particularly affects diffident people.Around people that a shy person does non deal very well, he or she whitethorn be reserved, but when in comfortable settings, he or she may be much much outgoing and talkative. This is also when people, such as myself, choose to phthisis jargon says or speak in old(prenominal) ways, but to a greater extent or less strangers, people generally tend to speak in more glob manners. Stuart did a great job summarizing how most people operate when speaking. I do the same things that he described. In my own experience, I have basic ways of talking, but they are different when I am around different people.I examine myself able to joke around with friends, where it would be hard for me, and make me uncomfortable to do the same with strangers or new acquaintances. In my life I have also find that people seem to form opinions about my character base on my word choice, just like people do about Stuart has when he refrains from using bad words. Also, when I joke around with people who do not have a good sense of humor, I find it harder to communicate or connect with them. If I were going to apply Stuarts ideas to my teaching, I would emphasize the different word choices that people use when they are in particular settings.I think it is amazing that people may seem like different people when they are in school, or church, but they are their usual, r elaxed self when in they are in familiar company. Identifying how people verbally react to particular settings is a great way to understand how individuals think and it provides insight to their character. Response to Jodi Arbus Reflection I agree with Jodi that particular regions of various countries have individual dialects. multitude in the midwestern states speak very differently from people in the south, or northeast.sometimes the accents are so strong that it is hard to understand what people from other parts of the country are even saying. But dialect, or accent, seems to result not at all from the personal character or word choice of someone, but from the environment he or she was raised in. People are able to adapt, and accents or dialects are examples of our adaptation, because we blend in with them. When we playact to a new place, eventually most of us will retreat our own accents and adopt the one of our new home.I do not have it away whether or not Jodi is right abo ut male and effeminate manner of speaking, as people of both sexes seem to have unrestricted speech characteristics based on their gender. In my own experience, I have noticed that my own accent separates me from authoritative(prenominal) people, and gives me something in common with other Mexican Americans. As English is my second language, I have a noted accent, and it lets people identify certain things about me. This accent also allows people to know things about how, and what community, I was raised in. Jodi also talked about the deflexion between male and female speech.I am not indisputable if I have noticed any differences other than that males usually use more slang and a more relaxed form of speech when in comfortable settings. I have also noticed the differences in positiveities that people use in certain areas. In the areas where I grew up, people a lot address each other in familiar tones, but when speaking to people from other areas, we are more formal. In the south, Jodi notices a key feature that people use when speaking they are often very formal and courteous, even to people who are somewhat familiar.This is interesting, because in my experience, I have noticed that many people do not even address strangers in ways that are very formal or customary. But I have noticed that this is different in other areas. I would use what Jodi wrote in my teachings by emphasizing accents or dialects that people use. These are important ways of understanding the characters of individuals, and determining what is a result of peoples character, instead of a result of the environment they were raised in. Also, it would be important to teach the differences in language from certain regions.Not only are the accents different, but the formality may be different as well. In the south, where people address one other in more formal ways, and say maam and sir more often , it is important to know the ways that people speak to know how to be inoffensive. So I w ould teach the differences in speech of certain regions, as that would help outsiders to seem friendly and polite when visiting. Understanding lingual characteristics in certain areas, and the differences from place to place will help people to communicate in friendly manners with people who are unfamiliar.