Philosophy Of Law Command Theory of Law

philosophy Of uprightness\n\nIn an endeavor to answer the question What the integrity is? professor J. L. capital of Texas proposes a Command Theory of Law. One way of apprehensiveness this possibleness of traditional positivism is to comp ar it to the famous empires of gallant Japan. These empires consisted of a single Emperor, or a sovereign , that was considered to consume the complete obedience of the heap in his empire. Another construction of his authority is the idea that there is no other policy-making figure higher than the Emperor. With such power and status at his disposal, the Emperor is able to subvert any degree of penalty that he affects fit if his pedagogys are not carried out or followed. In describing law as cosmos a dominance backed by threats of penalization for insubordination, capital of Texas is not contention that any type of education be considered a law. It would be absurd to think a father commanding his word of honor to take out the garbbage would be a type of command to be considered a law. Rather, being that laws govern entire chemical groups and societies, the commands essential originate from an authoritative cite or pedigree that the volume in the federation leap obedience to.\n\nIn analyzing Professor Austins surmisal of law, Professor H. L. A. Hart argues that Austin fails to pass the true bone marrow of law . Hart views Austins command supposition of law as no different than a grease-gun commanding a imprecate cashier to give him the bullion. In this example, the gunman is in a position of authority (in coitus to the bank fabricator) and is capable of inflicting fatal punishment to the bank teller if his commands are not carried out. Thus, as Hart contends, the bank teller would feel obliged to great deal the gunman the money for revere of the consequences that may follow if he does not give the money over to the gunman. It is apparent that the phantasm of such a theory is that it does not accurately describe what the law is and where it comes from. One may extract from such a theory the pressumption that the strongest person/group in a picky society will be the one capable of administering commands with threats of punishment. But, as an observer can see in modern society , the administors...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.