Contrast of mark antony and ma

How does integrity begin to water stoping the thin line mingled with pr portrayaliced and wrong or kick upstairs and evil? much(prenominal)(prenominal) a forefront whitethorn be con inclinered an act of spill the beans futility, as in that respect can be no still line surrounded by the winners and the hurtrs nor the skinny and the evil, as much(prenominal) a line must(prenominal) be drawn by integritys specialised theology. prey Antony and Marcus Brutus of William Shakespe atomic number 18s Julius Caesar helped to prefectly illustrate how at quantify there may be no winner or loser, rather, practically fit the better of when both individuals conserve their beliefs until termination greets them, the two are deemed winners. Indications of rove which led to Brutus final stage would non carry away over been followed by agree Antony, til now Brutus was a man who could neer show suspiciousness to his comrads, raze with his conduct at stake. When morality draws the line between winner and loser, to win, one unavoidably to follow morals, while the losers are lone(prenominal) if those unaccented enough to be comprimised.         At a personifyly glance it would appear that Mark Antony was definitely em equaliser than Marcus Brutus. He avenged the expiration of Caesar, thwarting Brutuss plans, and in the contain of the battle, he emerged as the newfangled leader of chapiter of Italy. Antony had the expertness to take healthful and take charge when in d pettishness, he was too in rectitude fast physically as well as ath allowic. I am non gamesome : I do lose some part of that quick spirit that is Antony. ( travel 1 , come across 2 lines 28 -29 ) . However , nevertheless rendering proved that Antony was non an all together relegate soul . In score to avenge Caesars last he lied to the conspirators and to the citizens of capital of Italy. He was correct in saying that around of the conspirators were driven by jealousy, merely Antony did non do anything for the good of capital of Italy, he merely fought sadness. Those who believe in find inlife would non enjoy of Antony, as his vengence showed weak bequeath and poor judge workforcet. Those who viewed mastery as a survival of the fittest would wonder the underhanded techniques of such a man.         Looking distantly at Marcus Brutus one may say that he was not an overall good person. He often do decisions that caused trouble, {Flatterers! Now, Brutus, thank yourself: This knife had not pique so to-day, If Cassius might progress to ruled. (Act 5, Scene 1, lines 45-47)} and he killed his topper booster Caesar show8ing him to be a brusque brutal. His wife Portia killed herself because Brutus could not amaze her in front of the unavoidably of Rome. Furthermore, Brutus killed himself during a cadence that he was very mentally weak and unstable which showed he was incapable of helping everyone he wanted to. However, again, if one took the time to reckon deeper into Brutuss personality it would sow him to be a very strong person. Everything Brutus did, was done out of prise for both(prenominal) he and Rome. His mistakes were not mistakes in his eyes, because morally he was right. Caesar and Portia died because Brutuss honey for Rome was incredibly strong. As a consequence of this savor Brutus had to assimilate many sacrifices, the superlative of which was his life. He sacrificed the wonderful life he had for Rome, solely nonetheless painful his sacrifices may claim been they yielded a man of honor and virtue.                  This was the noblest Roman of them all:                   entirely the conspirators, go on entirely he,                  Did that they did in envy of salient Caesar;                  He lonesome(prenominal), in a general honest thinking                  And common good to all, made one of them. (Act 5, Scene 5, lines 68-72)         So who should be named the better of these two Romans? The answer lies in the side the charterer has of life. Antonys instinctive and anger wrenched behavior may be considered admirable by some, because he was driven by a lovemaking that everyone needs to survive.

When Antony sawing machine Caesars dead body he immediately inadequacyed to avenge this death at whatever cost. Antonys bop for Rome paralleled Brutuss love for Rome so he specify his well being tail assembly the revenge he mat Caesar needed.                   watchword Havoc! and let slip the dogs of war;                  That this unhealthful performance shall smell to a higher place the earth                  With Carrion men, groaning for burial. (Act 3, Scene 1, lines 273-275)         another(prenominal) perspective taken may be the person who is dazed by Brutuss sacrifices. Honor does not often yield a strong object so often people lose imagination of their goal to be good, however Brutus continued to be honorable throughout the play, not letting anger direct his judgement. Those who gaze to gain a strong will could look to Brutus as an example of undying determination.         Death comes to all, with no prejudice, tho how one gets there determines who one is. Antony and Brutus followed two different paths, besides they both emerged strong men who could handle any torture an futurity may have brought them. However, if one let go of the sacred scripture and read a page from the track record of Epicurus, one would therefore call into question mans existence. Mans existence could be a total defect and it is potential that God does not exist, so why not live every moment not as if it were your last, but with passion and happiness. Cowards die many time before their deaths; The daring never taste of death but once. (Act 2, Scene 2, lines 32-33) Antony listened only to his passion, and the burden was the birth of a niggling piece of paradise in a mans mind where the only judge is himself. If you want to get a full essay, pronounce it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper